Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3299 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-3612QM - 174 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400H - 35 vs 45 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Core i7-3612QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Core i7-3612QM |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
