Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3174 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Celeron B830 - 282 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400H - 35 vs 45 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Celeron B830 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
