Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3228 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 284 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
284
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |