Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3208 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Pentium G640 - 284 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $30.0 vs $108.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-11400F - $0.12 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |