Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2753 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 35% better in Rust than Core i7-4820K - 220 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $108.0 vs $199.88
- Up to 60% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-4820K - $0.49 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-4820K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |