Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3410 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-3960X - 552 vs 511 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $105.99 vs $350.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-3960X - $0.14 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 65 vs 130 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
552
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $105.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 293 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
511
92.57246376811594%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
28.000000000000004%
Price, $
$350
30%
Buy for $350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Single-Core
690
35.18612952575217%
Multi-Core
3358
44.13774973711882%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |