Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2753 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4440 - 128 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-4440 - $115.99 vs $128.3
- Up to 17% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-4440 - $0.91 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Buy for $128.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |