Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3330S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3116 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3330S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3330S - 142 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-3330S - $115.99 vs $149.95
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3330S - $0.82 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3330S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |