Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-2500K - 282 vs 241 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $24.99 vs $105.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-11400F - $0.1 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
282
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
26.31578947368421%
Price, $
$105.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $105.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
241
85.46099290780141%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $24.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
32.942376338602756%
Multi-Core
1921
25.249737118822292%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |