Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 928 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 232 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $115.99 vs $561.32
- Up to 80% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.5 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
219
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
19%
Price, $
$561.32
20%
Buy for $561.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |