Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 54% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-4100 - 139 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $16.0 vs $115.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i5-11400F - $0.18 vs $0.83 per FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
21%
Price, $
$115.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for $16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |