Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1356 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 26% better in Rust than EPYC 7551 - 220 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD EPYC 7551 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |