Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 163 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$126
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $126 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |