Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1730 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 182 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $133.95 vs $136.62
- Up to 8% better value when playing God of War than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.74 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $133.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |