Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2844 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i5-4670 - 283 vs 271 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - $126.99 vs $140.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-4670 - $0.45 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
283
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$126.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $126.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
271
95.75971731448763%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
86.53846153846155%
Price, $
$140
90%
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
60.41237113402062%
Multi-Core
3228
44.21917808219178%
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |