Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 3739 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon X5690 - 195 vs 169 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon X5690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11260H | vs | Intel Xeon X5690 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Westmere-EP |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
