Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1280 - 167 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1280 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |