Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Halo Infinite than Core i3-3240T - 164 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $25.7 vs $115.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i5-10600KF - $0.17 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
23.94366197183099%
Price, $
$115.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
152
92.6829268292683%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
26.51245551601423%
Multi-Core
971
14.239624578383928%
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |