Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1400 - 193 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $42.88 vs $124.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10600KF - $0.24 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2690 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
178
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |