Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 590 vs 530 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $78.02 vs $143.7
- Up to 38% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10600K - $0.15 vs $0.24 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
590
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
62%
Price, $
$143.7
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8149 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
530
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |