Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 245 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $141.45 vs $999.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.58 vs $4.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 95 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 48 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$141.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $141.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |