Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 13% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Xeon E3-1270 - 145 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1270 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 80 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |