Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Core i3-7100 - 278 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $70.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-10600 - $0.26 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5844 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |