Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 127% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G1620 - 202 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - $49.0 vs $200.65
- Up to 44% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i5-10500 - $0.55 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
55.55555555555556%
Price, $
$200.65
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $200.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1665 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
89
44.05940594059406%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
26.925608953258724%
Multi-Core
723
13.217550274223036%
Intel Core i5-10500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |