Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 201 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |