Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2908 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 350 vs 326 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
350
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 87 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |