Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G3420 - 132 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $21.1 vs $99.95
- Up to 76% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-10400F - $0.18 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
23%
Price, $
$99.95
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13850 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
120
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$21.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $21.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13849 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Pentium G3420 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |