Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2558 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-4800MQ - 184 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |