Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2890 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-3320M - 182 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3320M - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3320M |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |