Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2798 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron B830 - 107 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Celeron B830 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |