Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 82 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $99.95 vs $345.85
- Up to 69% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $0.27 vs $0.88 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 7% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10400F - 395 vs 369 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
369
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
395
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
30%
Price, $
$345.85
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $345.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |