Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 6 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $99.95 vs $150.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.51 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Core i5-10400F - 207 vs 197 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
197
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4272 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |