Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than FX-8350 - 267 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8350 - $99.95 vs $185.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-8350 - $0.37 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |