Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i5-10300H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 839 days newer than Core i5-10300H.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 24% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-10300H - 158 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 32 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
