Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10210U outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10210U is 1808 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 167 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10210U - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10210U
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10210U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
