Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i5-10210U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 355 days older than Core i5-10210U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 5% better in War Thunder than Core i5-10210U - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10210U - 32 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10210U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |