Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Core i5-10210U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 489 days older than Core i5-10210U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-10210U - 170 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10210U - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2021 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10210U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |