Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9350KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9350KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9350KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $198.94 vs $275.98
- Up to 26% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900 - $1.63 vs $2.21 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-9350KF - 125 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
122
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $198.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3582 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.21/FPS
73%
Price, $
$275.98
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3583 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |