Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100T outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100T is 676 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $99.0 vs $1595.95
- Up to 94% better value when playing Dead Space than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.66 vs $10.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 44 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6277 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.64/FPS
6.203007518796992%
Price, $
$1595.95
6%
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |