Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $115.0 vs $460.74
- Up to 63% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-13900K - $1.98 vs $5.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 47% better in Starfield than Core i3-9100F - 85 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.42/FPS
36%
Price, $
$460.74
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $460.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |