Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 840 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-7700T - 225 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $56.99 vs $150.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i7-7700T - $0.25 vs $0.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1908 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |