Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100 is 387 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 4% better in Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 141 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $122.18 vs $270.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.87 vs $2.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $122.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |