Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 612 days newer than Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 62 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i3-8300 - 61 vs 57 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$579.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $579.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |