Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1686 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $199.99 vs $472.02
- Up to 48% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7950X - $1.16 vs $2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 62 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 23% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-8300 - 213 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
173
81%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
52%
Price, $
$472.02
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $472.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |