Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8109U outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8109U is 1305 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 201 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 28 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-8109U
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
