Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $51.6 vs $589.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900KS - $0.14 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 60 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 63% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-7350K - 606 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
371
61%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
606
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
14%
Price, $
$589.99
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $589.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |