Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-7350K - 260 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1452
86.94610778443113%
Multi-Core
2873
49.594337994130846%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |