Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $129.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Control than Core i7-10700F - $0.64 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i3-7300 - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7263 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
57%
Price, $
$225.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |