Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1288 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $51.6 vs $897.22
- Up to 94% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.29 vs $4.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7100T - 192 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
181
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13446 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.67/FPS
6%
Price, $
$897.22
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13446 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |