Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320 - 200 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than FX-8320 - $75.0 vs $95.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320 - $0.38 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |